How can potential benefits from embryonic stem cell extraction outweigh its moral costs?

depinds what moral means to you. and when do you deem a baby comes to life span. if you think that a toddler is called a enthusiasm, a person, surrounded by the moment of the conception (when it is concieved), then it's loose. but if you think that a babe-in-arms is called a individual in the moment he is born, after it's not that immoral.
but suppose at this for a change. you are a parent of a bone marrow disease and the simply way to cure him is by a transplant of stem cell. you exausted all the other option, nothing works. the simply answer, stem cells. what do you do afterwards? you can't even start to feel the agony of those parents who have no other alternative but to resort to this entity.
so it's just a issue of being within that position or not. when it is come to that, you don't stop anymore and think if it's perverted or not, you just do it to liberate your child.
They can't. the scientists should do more research on the embilical chords, instead. This would allow the same even of research without taking the lives of the embrios.
There is no moral cost surrounded by saving a folks life beside stem cells that be not going to be used to create life.
Simple! THERE IS NO MORAL COST! ONLY A MORON COST!
an embryo is not a personage. its probly on a similar biological level to a bacterium.

tvs

hair gel